4
Linchi, I have some questions about the chart diagrams you posted, but won't be home until Wednesday. You have put a tremendous amount of thought and work into that research, over 400 pages. This is very unusual in the astrological community. May I ask how you chose the Krishnamurti ayanamsa? I'm also interested in perhaps an illustration or two comparing the mean and so-called true nodes. (I usually prefer the mean node myself.)

I'm thinking, however, that these topics would be better discussed on the Sidereal part of Skyscript.
http://www.snowcrest.net/sunrise/LostZodiac.htm

5
hi Therese

I have been using Krishnamurti ayanamsa for 20 years after reading Richard Houck's book Death in Astrology. His Ayanamsa is also very similar. My experiences have also convinced me that Krishnamurti Ayanamsa is the best we have in this time. In theory, one can tell a lot but practically you can not prove 100 percent which Ayanamsa is the right one.
For that we need:
1-On the seconds exact birth times
2-The right ruler
3-The right Nakshatras and right rulers for these Nakshatras

I think it's a very long way until we find proper Ayanamsa, especially if the astrologers accept everything as it is given.

In my researches the Planet pictures are the same, no matter which Ayanamsa one takes.

I will soon prepare and post a few examples about true vs mean node.

Thank you for your interest Therese


linchi
https://archive.org/details/@cemalcicek

6
Linchi wrote:
I will soon prepare and post a few examples about true vs mean node.
I am very much looking forward to this as I've been wanting to see real support for one node or the other, although we now know that the so-called "true" node isn't really any more true than the mean node.

A good place for this discussion would be a new topic on the Sidereal part of the forum as the topic here is mainly for notices, news and links.

I do think we're well into the most accurate ayanamsa ball park with Krishnamurti and Richard Houck's ayanamsa which is very close to Krishnamurti. We can see this by work with the varga charts. There are many cases when a planet just barely makes it into another sign or just misses the next sign when using the Krishnamurti ayanamsa. It's easy to mentally place those planets in varga signs with Lahiri for comparison. I haven't found that the Fagan-Bradley ayanamsa even comes close using varga (divisional) charts.

Linchi, I'm definitely confused about your use of harmonics, when and why you use a particular harmonic, etc. Also there is very little explanation in a preface to the many illustrated charts to explain what you are doing. This is why I suggest a separate topic for discussion and questions regarding your suicide research.
http://www.snowcrest.net/sunrise/LostZodiac.htm