16 by sigma4 Dear Mark, I also think we maybe need to take a further virgoan step and say "essentially strong[er]" and "accidentally strong[er]" to clearify the term "strong". Obvious reason behind this is that 'strong' is ambiguous as it is applicable to both essential strength and accidental strength of a planet. Otherwise things often get complicated (for me at least). Because when an astrologer simply(?) say that 'a planet is strong' I stop and ask myself whether s/he means : a) that that planet is essentially strong, or b) that it is accidentally strong, or c) that it is strong in both terms Quote Fri Feb 03, 2006 9:57 pm
17 by sigma4 Aha! I suggest to use "really strong", or STRONG for the last one (see my previous post), where a planet is strong both essentially and accidentally Quote Fri Feb 03, 2006 10:02 pm