2
hi stefan,

thanks very much for posting this link... i have been busy with other priorities and haven't had much time to make it to skyscript, but i appreciate you having shared this..

so much of astrologic is circular but short circuits for me.. i can't agree with his conclusions in the centre of the video where he gives the examples 40 or more minutes in, for a number of reasons.. while they are all logical on the surface, i feel the conclusions are forced.. i can be more specific if you'd like.. i do enjoy how in the case of the chart he is presently discussing - denis nilsen at 43 minutes in - he's making use of midpoints..

what i find interesting is how dependent the value ken bowser sees in sidereal is on tropical... i wonder what his thoughts would be if he wasn't constantly referencing the tropical charts with all these examples to make his point on sidereal?? it seems a lot of the thinking is also very stereotypical too..

i enjoyed his comments on solar returns.. thanks stefan!