skyscript.co.uk
   

home articles forum events
glossary horary quiz consultations links more

Read this before using the forum
Register
FAQ
Search
View memberlist
View/edit your user profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Recent additions:
Can assassinations be prevented? by Elsbeth Ebertin
translated by Jenn Zahrt PhD
A Guide to Interpreting The Great American Eclipse
by Wade Caves
The Astrology of Depression
by Judith Hill
Understanding the mean conjunctions of the Jupiter-Saturn cycle
by Benjamin Dykes
Understanding the zodiac: and why there really ARE 12 signs of the zodiac, not 13
by Deborah Houlding

Skyscript Astrology Forum

Triplicity rulers vs. Term rulers

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Traditional (& Ancient) Techniques
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
astrojin



Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Posts: 466

Posted: Sat Apr 15, 2006 8:48 am    Post subject: Triplicity rulers vs. Term rulers Reply with quote

Hello,

In going through Dorotheus of Sidon, "Carmen Astrologicum", translated by David Pingree, I found that the Author (Dorotheus or whoever it was) put a lot of emphasis in Triplicity (Trigon) rulers of the zodiacal signs. In fact this was his first lesson (in Chapter 1), making sure that his son (or whoever it was) understood the different triplicity rulers. The Arabs (many of whom relied heavily on Dorotheus) also used a lot of these trip rulers in their astrological texts. Bonatti (who compiled many of the Arabic sources) also outlined the three trip rulers for each house governing different areas in the said houses and a detail account of directing by triplicities - the idea that every one third part of life is governed by the three trip rulers of ascendant (if you follow Bonatti) or main luminary (if you follow the Arabs).

Meanwhile, other authors (the Author of Liber Hermetis) and Firmicus Maternus (author of Mathesis) relied heavily on terms and term rulers. Examples are abound in Liber Hermetis of the effects of planets in their own signs or terms (not exaltation, not triplicities!). Firmicus used a lot of term rulers e.g. in delineating wealth, one of the requirements is that the sign ruler and term ruler of Part of Fortune should aspect the Part itself (not exalted ruler, not trip rulers!). Even Bonatti gives priority on term ruler (of Hyleg) for the determination of Alchocoden (not exalted ruler, not trip rulers).

My first question:-

1. Why are the triplicity and term rulers given priorities over exalted rulers but at the same time the exalted rulers are always given higher dignitiy points (4 for exalted rulers, 3 for trip rulers and 2 for term rulers)?

My second question:-

It seems to me that there are 2 camps of astrologers. Those who give emphasis to sign and trip rulers and those who favor sign and term rulers.

Why?

If there are actually no 2 camps of astrologers (just different ways of looking at things), how do these astrologers decide that for this matter we look into term rulers and for that we look intro triplicity rulers?

Thank you in advance...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Traditional (& Ancient) Techniques All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
. Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

       
Contact Deborah Houlding  | terms and conditions  
All rights on all text and images reserved. Reproduction by any means is not permitted without the express
agreement of Deborah Houlding or in the case of articles by guest astrologers, the copyright owner indictated