skyscript.co.uk
   

home articles forum events
glossary horary quiz consultations links more

Read this before using the forum
Register
FAQ
Search
View memberlist
View/edit your user profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Recent additions:
Can assassinations be prevented? by Elsbeth Ebertin
translated by Jenn Zahrt PhD
A Guide to Interpreting The Great American Eclipse
by Wade Caves
The Astrology of Depression
by Judith Hill
Understanding the mean conjunctions of the Jupiter-Saturn cycle
by Benjamin Dykes
Understanding the zodiac: and why there really ARE 12 signs of the zodiac, not 13
by Deborah Houlding

Skyscript Astrology Forum

Is this Mutual reception strong?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Nativities & General Astrology
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Is it Strong
Strong
66%
 66% 
Nothing Special
33%
 33% 

Author Message
fire_goat



Joined: 12 Nov 2007
Posts: 2

Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:04 pm    Post subject: Is this Mutual reception strong? Reply with quote

Hi, im new,

i've a question, is this a actual mutual reception? is it strong?

Uranus @ 20 Sag (in the 4th, also in trine to the rising) sextile Jupiter @ 21 Aqua (in the 6th but oppossed the ascendant (asc=24 Leo))

both are quite active in the chart
Uranus aspects
-square moon
-parallel mercury, venus and neptune
-sextile jupiter
-trine asc

jupiter aspects
-square and parallel mars
-sextile uranus
-opp and contra-parallel asc
-contra-parallel north node
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tara



Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 454

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 9:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well if you give Uranus co=rulership of Aquarius, you have a mutual reception by domicile so it would be strong.

Tara
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
yuzuru



Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Posts: 1392

Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is NO mutual reception, as reception is a traditional concept, and not a modern one, so we donīt use the "modern rulership" of aquarius, only the real one.

I would also add that I donīt see the need to open a poll for this...
_________________
Meu blog de astrologia (em portugues) http://yuzuru.wordpress.com
My blog of astrology (in english) http://episthemologie.wordpress.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Coder



Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 143

Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 10:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sheesh yuzuru - I have never seen such a back-to-front argument anywhere else. Hey, boxing gloves not allowed here - we believe only in good old-fashioned bare-knuckle fighting.

FWIW, I would read it strong(er than a straight sextile). But Uranus is square to Moon, so where is Jupiter in relation to the Moon? Inconjunct or semisextile? That aspect, as also any relations to the Sun, should be treated as more significant to the reading as a whole.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fire_goat



Joined: 12 Nov 2007
Posts: 2

Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 3:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

thx all,

Tara wrote:
Well if you give Uranus co=rulership of Aquarius, you have a mutual reception by domicile so it would be strong.

Tara


thx, i agree lol

yuzuru wrote:
There is NO mutual reception, as reception is a traditional concept, and not a modern one, so we donīt use the "modern rulership" of aquarius, only the real one.

I would also add that I donīt see the need to open a poll for this...


[joke]but polls are fun[/joke],
[topic]i don't think uranus should be ruled out just because is not a traditional planet, saturn is also in sag, but not in any mayor aspect, lol i think they're in a quintile[/topic]

Coder wrote:
Sheesh yuzuru - I have never seen such a back-to-front argument anywhere else. Hey, boxing gloves not allowed here - we believe only in good old-fashioned bare-knuckle fighting.

FWIW, I would read it strong(er than a straight sextile). But Uranus is square to Moon, so where is Jupiter in relation to the Moon? Inconjunct or semisextile? That aspect, as also any relations to the Sun, should be treated as more significant to the reading as a whole.

thx, well, moon is @ 22 pisces, so its semi-sextile jupiter, uranus would make no aspect to the sun, other than a wide and i mean wide semi-sextile (sun @24 Cap, conjunct venus @ 23 Cap) and maybe very wide orb parallel also to the sun,
so any aspect of this two planets should be considered more important? (mars also dignified @ 19 scorpio)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Nativities & General Astrology All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
. Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

       
Contact Deborah Houlding  | terms and conditions  
All rights on all text and images reserved. Reproduction by any means is not permitted without the express
agreement of Deborah Houlding or in the case of articles by guest astrologers, the copyright owner indictated