skyscript.co.uk
   

home articles forum events
glossary horary quiz consultations links more

Read this before using the forum
Register
FAQ
Search
View memberlist
View/edit your user profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Recent additions:
Can assassinations be prevented? by Elsbeth Ebertin
translated by Jenn Zahrt PhD
A Guide to Interpreting The Great American Eclipse
by Wade Caves
The Astrology of Depression
by Judith Hill
Understanding the mean conjunctions of the Jupiter-Saturn cycle
by Benjamin Dykes
Understanding the zodiac: and why there really ARE 12 signs of the zodiac, not 13
by Deborah Houlding

Skyscript Astrology Forum

A Question.

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Philosophy & Science
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
eon_blue



Joined: 08 Mar 2004
Posts: 1

Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 2:18 am    Post subject: A Question. Reply with quote

Someone asked me and I havent been able to find an answer yet. "Why is it that only constellations of the zodiac effect man, when there are more important constellations?" Can anyone answer this? Thanks in advance.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tom
Moderator


Joined: 11 Oct 2003
Posts: 3452
Location: New Jersey, USA

Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 1:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Eon,

The short answer is "Constellations don't affect man." Most astrologers use the tropical zodiac, which begins at the vernal equinox, the point where the apparent path of the Sun crosses the celestial equator. That point is 0 degrees Aries. Each sign occupies 30 degrees of arc from that point on. The signs have the same names as the constellations of the zodiac, but, like I said, most astrologers don't plot the planets according to their positions in the constellations. Rather they plot them in accordance with the system mentioned above. The signs and constellations do not line up.

There are many good beginner's books on the market that explain this in detail.

If you're looking for some kind of physical cause and effect, many astrologers don't buy into that either, but some think it will be found someday.

Tom
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Minderwiz



Joined: 10 Jul 2004
Posts: 23
Location: Wigan, Lancs

Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2004 10:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just to take Tom's commnts a little further - The Sun is the major planet in Astrology - the apparant path of the Sun around Earth (the ecliptic) is seen against the background of the constellations of the Zodiac, therefore constellations which the Sun does not pass through are seen as having no relevance.

There are still Astrologers who use the Sidereal Zodiac, mainly Vedic Astrologers, but they two keep to the twelve Zodiac signs.

Declination North or South of the Celestial Equator is taken into account in Astrology but this is not particularly great - mainly between the Tropics of Cancer and Capricorn, though some planets do go 'out of bounds' to a relatively small extent. The 'action' therefore is really on or about the plane of the Celestial Equator
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Philosophy & Science All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
. Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

       
Contact Deborah Houlding  | terms and conditions  
All rights on all text and images reserved. Reproduction by any means is not permitted without the express
agreement of Deborah Houlding or in the case of articles by guest astrologers, the copyright owner indictated