17
Mjacob wrote:They have loosened my strait-jacket a moment allowing me to note that your reply seems to be more of a political statement than an astrological one so might be contrary to forum guidelines and subject to censure from the moderator

Best regards

:-)
What do you think about my post on this sub forum regarding the fact that if we are to properly analyse event we need to define the truth of that event?

Just going to ignore it are you?

18
Phoenix - i am not sure what sub-post you refer to but I did read the article you linked to a while back. The last bit of it I seem to remember said that France was indifferent to the allegations so if they do not care why should I?
Matthew Goulding

19
Mjacob wrote:Phoenix - i am not sure what sub-post you refer to but I did read the article you linked to a while back. The last bit of it I seem to remember said that France was indifferent to the allegations so if they do not care why should I?
What?

Because it's the truth. If you want to analyse something astrologically you don't want to analyse a lie unknowningly do you?

Here is what I said about it before, since you are clearly incapable of scrolling down the board to see any of my other posts:
Phoenix9061210 wrote:Hey,

So I've had this thought about astrology that at least half of it is making sure you know the truth of what is being looked at, otherwise how can you come to accurate conclusions about what the planetary influences are?

Now, just to say, my favourite astrologer and one whose books I have devoured is Liz Greene, However, in her book 'The Dark of The Soul' she brings up the idea of Joseph McCarthy as a sociopath/ negative character.

What I have since learned is that actually, Joseph McCarthy DID find very, very dangerous Communists in government. When the Soviet Union declassified their information it was found that he was correct most of the time. Including a fella known as McLaughlin who was advisor to the President. Also, the American communists promoted communism in China to quite a disgusting result.

What we know of McCarthy, or what the mainstream view of him is is what the Communists wanted us to think!

So clearly Liz's explanation of the planets of Joseph McCarthy cannot be correct if her facts are wrong! The same goes for many figures. That the facts are just as important than the astrology.

So rather than saying 'this line make so on so a liar' a better example might be 'this line may have been why so on so did x on y day'!