home articles forum events
glossary horary quiz consultations links more

Read this before using the forum
View memberlist
View/edit your user profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Recent additions:
The Life & Work of Vettius Valens
by Deborah Houlding
Can assassinations be prevented? by Elsbeth Ebertin
translated by Jenn Zahrt PhD
A Guide to Interpreting The Great American Eclipse
by Wade Caves
The Astrology of Depression
by Judith Hill
Understanding the zodiac: and why there really ARE 12 signs of the zodiac, not 13
by Deborah Houlding

Skyscript Astrology Forum

Goto page Previous  1, 2
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Sidereal Astrology
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

Joined: 03 Jul 2009
Posts: 408

Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ouranos wrote:

What about harmonic 4 and 8? Do you find a lot of discrepancy when moving to 32 and greater?

If you were to use larger orb e.g. 1° or more, you could have used harmonic 4 and 8. But I take at most in harmonic 16 10 minutes orb. If the planets are under the limit of my orb, they will also be seen in harmonic 16. I don't need to look at harmonic 4 and 8 additionally.

Does the software you use do the precession correction?

That is not a precision corrected. It is simple sidereal zodiac with Krishnamurti Ayanamsa. If you would choose Krishnamurti Ayanamsa in different astrology programs, there will always be discrepancies between software. I always give my values that I use, so that you can have equal values, when you make the changes in software settings. Regardless, the planet pictures will remain the same.

For example Lewis Carroll born in 1832 is far off from the Krishnamurti Ayanamsa for Year 2000

It does not matter. The software then calculates previous years as 2000 automatically. You can choose sidereal zodiac with Krishnamurti Ayanamsa. Only the values may differ from each other by a few seconds.

Znet vs Nova Wheels - Pros and cons?

Zet has less harmonic points marked than Nova, but zet is faster and more practical. Biwheel settings of the Zet much better than Nova.
Nova is disastrous for progression calculations and illustrations. I use Nova only for natal charts because of several marked harmonic points.

I have Solar Fire 9.0. Is it reliable enough to reproduce your method?

Yes, if you choose sidereal zodiac and Krishnamurti Ayanamsa. But if solar fire can calculate all harmonics (64,256,1024, 4096,...) that I use, I don't know. I have written to those in 2019 what else should be done in Nova.

My mother died of a liver cancer June 8, 1992 at 17h(EDT) in Trois-Fivieres, Quebec, Canada 46N21 72W33
She was born Dec 15, 1929 Unknown birth time (EST) in St-Michel du Squatech 47N53 68W43

Your mother then had in harmonic 16 ; solar NE/PL = r SU for the 12 noon birth time. Solar Jupiter next to solar Pluto shows the liver. For the birth time 14:39 solar NE/PL = r SU would be exact. Of course, it had to be possible to find the right time of birth. However, I have not yet dealt with indeterminate birth times.

For the birth time 14:39 with secondary progression in harmonic 16 :

p MA/SA = p SU difference is zero seconds.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 28 Mar 2020
Posts: 670

Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2021 10:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you so much Linchi for all your answers and feedback!
Keep up your good work!

Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Sidereal Astrology All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
. Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Contact Deborah Houlding  | terms and conditions  
All rights on all text and images reserved. Reproduction by any means is not permitted without the express
agreement of Deborah Houlding or in the case of articles by guest astrologers, the copyright owner indictated