Last Solar of Kennedy, John F. 1 by linchi Last Solar of Kennedy, John F. Kennedy, John F. 29 May 1917 at 15:00 (= 3:00 PM )Brookline, Massachusetts, 42n20, 71w07 https://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Kennedy,_John_F. Death by Homicide 22 November 1963 at 12:30 PM in Dallas (Assassinated, age 46) Solar Return : 30.05.1963 8:45:06 Dallas, Texas. Harmonic 16 If we look at this solar with harmonic 16, we will not see at first sight that ZE = MA/SA. However, an experienced observer with the help of the small red dots and the pointer that showing the harmonic points, will notice that Mars and Saturn are equidistant from these points. To see better or clearer we look with Harmonic 64. Harmonic 64 ZE = AC/SA = MA/SA ZE = 1° 27' 41'' + 2° 48' 45'' = 4° 16' 26'' AC/SA = 4° 16' 21'' MA/SA = 4° 16' 11'' ZE = MA/SA : Death by gunshot (Lexicon for Planetary Picture , page 34) ZE = MA/SA : Death by assassination, fire, or gunshot (Rulebook for Planetary Picture , page 255) AC/SA : Separation from others (Rulebook for Planetary Picture , page 172) AC = MA AC = 1° 11' 47'' MA = 1° 11' 26'' I wanted to show here why we need to look at higher harmonics. Otherwise we will not be able to see many things. It could also have been that we first saw in harmonic 256 or 1024 not like here immediately in harmonic 64. But if we had a software that showed the harmonic points, we could have seen easier. If we had taken the birthplace instead of assassination location : Harmonic 64 Solar Return : 30.05.1963 10:43:31 Brookline, Massachusetts. AC would not be exact with Mars. But AC stands PL/MN Midpoint. AC = PL/MN : Change of the circumstances (Rulebook for Planetary Picture , page 212) Of course, it would be better if we had corrected the time of birth to the seconds and then compared the solar returns with the place of birth and the place of assassination. With such several examples we would have brought clarity whether we must take birth place and/or event place with the returns calculations. https://archive.org/details/@cemalcicek Quote Sat Nov 06, 2021 6:08 am
2 by Atlantean Very interesting... I notice that in the converse Solar Return (for Dallas) there is also the Zeus = Ascendant/Saturn picture in the 4th Harmonic. If we extended that to the 16th Harmonic, there would also be Zeus = Ascendant/Saturn = Moon/Saturn (4') Quote Sat Nov 06, 2021 10:11 am
3 by Atlantean I'd love it if you checked JFK's solar returns for Dallas (the event), the White House (his residence as of the SR), and for Brookline (his birthplace) to see the differences in the harmonic system you use. You mentioned using a tightly rectified time and I would recommend 2:59:44 pm, rectified by Isaac Starkman. Using this time, the Topocentric Primary Directions and Progressed Sidereal Solar Return aspects pan out great for the events we have... Quote Sat Nov 06, 2021 11:45 am
4 by linchi 1) Birth Time 15:00 Solar Return Harmonic 64 White House 38° 53' 51.634" N 77° 2' 11.508" W 2) Birth Time 14:59:44 White House 38° 53' 51.634" N 77° 2' 11.508" W Under my data I have Kennedy's birth time 14:58:25. I do not know if I have already corrected his birth time. I have own birth time correction method. I do not use house systems. I do not use aspects such as sextile, trigon and so on. I only use the harmonics, that is square, half square, and so on. If you don't know yet and are interested, here are the two my works about birth time correction. Birth Time Correction https://ia600705.us.archive.org/3/items ... ection.pdf The exact time of death and birth time correction https://ia801000.us.archive.org/22/item ... ection.pdf 3) Birth Time 14:58:25 White House 38° 53' 51.634" N 77° 2' 11.508" W ZE = 1° 27' 41'' + 1° 24' 22'' = 2° 52' 03'' AC = 2° 51' 18'' I am in no way saying that 14:58:25 is right and Starkman's correction is wrong. It is only an example and proves nothing. https://archive.org/details/@cemalcicek Quote Sat Nov 06, 2021 3:40 pm